Mississippi's Sweepstakes Ban Bill: A Buried Treasure?
By: Richard Janvrin03/14/2025 07:55 Uncensored InsightPhoto by Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0
Il Maryland e il Mississippi stanno approvando una legge per vietare i casinò.
Mississippi's Senate Bill 2510, initially aimed at eliminating sweepstakes casinos, transformed into a flawed treasure map filled with complications. Let's explore these twists and turns together.
Richard Janvrin, a UNH English/Journalism graduate and industry maverick since 2015, has been providing insights on sports, sports betting, and online casinos. Post-2018's PASPA repeal, he's produced a wealth of casino content, including guides, reviews, bonuses, promotions, and breaking news. His dedication to keeping you informed about the online casino world remains steadfast.
All Reviews by Richard JanvrinRichard Janvrin## Related News
Check it out
Complexities in Senate Bill 2510
- From Origin to Amendments
- The Original Scenario: Initially, Senate Bill 2510 sought to prohibit sweepstakes casinos, threatening felony charges and substantial penalties.
- The Amended Version: The House inserted language to legalize online sports betting, allowing partnerships between land-based casinos and online sportsbooks. State Rep. Casey Eure proposed this change.
- Clash of Chambers
- Talks Gone Awry: A conference committee struggled to reconcile differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill. The Senate firmly rejected the House's amendments, leaving both sides at an impasse.
- The Final Nail: The inability to agree on language led to the bill's stalemate, resulting in its ultimate demise before the legislative deadline.
- Factions and Feelings
- The Supporters: Rep. Eure and proponents of online sports betting anticipated potential tax revenues for Mississippi if they legalized online sports betting.
- The Opponents: Sen. David Blount, Chair of the Senate Gaming Committee, opposed the amendments, playing a significant role in the bill's failure.
- Implications for the Industry
- Cause for Celebration: The bill's collapse turned out to be a win for the sweepstakes industry. However, traditional gambling operators may feel disappointed by the missed opportunity to restrict sweepstakes operations in Mississippi.
The complex web of conflicting interests when addressing sweepstakes and online sports betting within a single piece of legislation ultimately led to Senate Bill 2510's downfall.
- Richard Janvrin, a journalism graduate from UNH and a long-standing industry expert in sports, sports betting, and online casinos, has analyzed Senate Bill 2510, which initially targeted sweepstakes casinos but ended up presenting challenges.
- The original goal of Senate Bill 2510 was to outlaw sweepstakes casinos, imposing felony charges and severe penalties.
- State Rep. Casey Eure proposed amendments to the bill, introducing the legalization of online sports betting and enabling partnerships between land-based casinos and online sportsbooks.
- A conference committee faced difficulties in reconciling differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill, leading to an impasse and ultimately the bill's stalemate.
- Consequently, the bill failed to pass before the legislative deadline, creating a victory for the sweepstakes industry but potentially leaving traditional gambling operators disappointed and the opportunity for regulation in Mississippi unrealized.
